Motion for Oral Argument Ada Lois Sipuel v. OU Board of Regents

              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA

 ADA LOIS SIPUEL PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
 vs.
 BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA, GEORGE L. CROSS, MAURICE  H. MERRILL, GEORGE WADSACK and ROY GITTINGER DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

 No. 32756

 MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
 Come now the plaintiff in error and respectfully moves the court to grant  leave to submit oral argument in this cause, and in support thereof  represents and shows to the court as follows:
 1. This appeal presents questions of general and state-wide interest  and importance involving the constitutionality of the seperate school  laws of the State of Oklahoma.
 2. The appeal in this case involves a novel question of general interest  and importance which has not heretofore been decided by this court,  to-wit:
 The refusal of the Board of Regents and the administrative officers of  the University of Oklahoma to admit plaintiff in error to the School of  Law constitutes a denial of rights secured under the Fourteent Amendment  of the constitution of the United States.
 3. The nature and affect of this appeal is such that a proper presentation  of the questions involved warrants submission of oral argument.

 Respectfully submitted,
 [signature] Amos T. Hall
 [signature] Thurgood Marshall
 [signature] Robert L. Carter
 Attorneys for Plaintiff in Error