Petition in Error Ada Lois Sipuel v. OU Board of Regents

              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
 Ada Lois Sipuel	Plaintiff in Error, 
vs No. 32756
 Board of Regents: of the University of Oklahoma, George L. Cross, Maurice H. Merrill, George Wadsack and Roy Gittinger,	Defendants in Error.
  PETITION IN ERROR
 The said Ada Lois Sipuel, plaintiff in error, complains of said defend-ants in error for that the said defendants in error on the 9th day of July, 1946, in the District Court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma, recovered a judgment, by the consideration of said court, against the said plaintiff in error, in a certain action then pending in the said court, wherein the said Ada Lois Sipuel was plaintiff and the said Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, George L. Cross, Maurice H. Merrill, George Wadsack and Roy Gittinger were defendants.
 The orginal case-made, duly signed, attested, and filed is hereunto attached, marked *Exhibit A", and made a part of this petition in error; and the said Ada Lois Sipuel avers that there is error in the said record and proceedings, in this, to wit:
 (1) Error of the court in denying the petition of the plaintiff for a writ of mandamus.
 (2) Errorsof law occuring at the trial which were accepted to by the plaintiff.
 Wherefore, plaintiff in error prays that the said judgment so rendered may be reversed, set aside, and held for naught, and that a judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff in error and against the defendants in error, upon the agreed statement of facts , and that the plaintiff in error