Workplace Safety 2003 pt1 |
Previous | 1 of 2 | Next |
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
This page
All
|
L 400.3 W926s/h 2003 c.l Worker Safety Policy Council Workplace Safety Program For High-Hazard Employers Annual Report December 2003 Submitted pursuant to Title 36 O.S. § 6702 Brenda Reneau Wynn Commissioner of Labor TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Authority and Procedure 1 ll. Worker Safety Policy Council 2003 Members 2 ill. 1996 Report 6 Chart 1: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 7 Chart 2: 1997 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 7 Chart 3: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 7 Chart 4: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 8 Chart 5: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 8 Chart 6: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 9 Chart 7: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 9 Chart 8: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 10 Chart 9: 1997 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 10 Chart 10: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 10 Chart 11: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 11 Chart 12: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 11 Chart 13: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 12 Chart 14: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 12 Chart 15: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 13 Chart 16: 1997 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 13 Chart 17: 1998 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 13 Chart 18: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 14 -1- Chart 19: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 14 Chart 20: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 15 Chart 21: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 15 Chart 22: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1996 High-Hazard SIC's 16 IV. 1997 Report 18 Chart 23: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 19 Chart 24: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 19 Chart 25: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 19 Chart 26: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20 Chart 27: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20 Chart 28: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20 Chart 29: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 21 Chart 30: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 21 Chart 31: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 21 Chart 32: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22 Chart 33: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22 Chart 34: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22 Chart 35: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 23 Chart 36: 1998 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 23 Chart 37: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 23 Chart 38: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24 Chart 39: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24 Chart 40: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24 -11- Chart 41: 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1997 High-Hazard SIC's 25 V. 1998 Report 27 Chart 42: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 28 Chart 43: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 28 Chart 44: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 28 Chart 45: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 29 Chart 46: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 29 Chart 47: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 30 Chart 48: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 30 Chart 49: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 30 Chart 50: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 31 Chart 51: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 31 Chart 52: Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 32 Chart 53: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 32 Chart 54: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 32 Chart 55: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 33 Chart 56: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 33 Chart 57: 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1998 High-Hazard SIC's 34 VI. 1999 Report 36 Chart 58: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 37 Chart 59: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 37 Chart 60: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 38 -111- Chart 61: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 38 Chart 62: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 39 Chart 63: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 39 Chart 64: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 40 Chart 65: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 40 Chart 66: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 41 Chart 67: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 41 Chart 68: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 42 Chart 69: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 42 Chart 70: 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1999 High-Hazard SIC's 43 VII. 2000 Report 45 Chart 71: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 46 Chart 72: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 46 Chart 73: 2003 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 46 Chart 74: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 47 Chart 75: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 47 Chart 76: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 47 Chart 77: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 48 Chart 78: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 48 Chart 79: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 48 Chart 80: 2000, 2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 2000 High-Hazard SIC's 49 -IV- VB. 2001 Report 51 Chart 81: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 52 Chart 82: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 52 Chart 83: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 53 Chart 84: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 53 Chart 85: Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 54 Chart 86: 2002 Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 54 Chart 87: 2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 2001 High-Hazard SIC's 55 -v- I. AUTHORIlY & PROCEDURE Title 36 O.S. § 6702 establishes a reporting requirement which is subsequent to the List of Most Hazardous Industries reporting required by Title 40 O.S. § 425. The reporting process consists of the Oklahoma Department of Labor identifying hazardous industries with high incidence rates by Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC) and transmitting this list to the Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner within 45 days of publication of the annual Occupational Injury & lllness Report by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics which is based upon the data and information provided by the Oklahoma Department of Labor, Statistical Research & Analysis Unit. The Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner then distributes the list to all insurance companies who provide workers' compensation insurance in the state. Under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702, all insurance companies, including CompSource Oklahoma, must notify listed policyholders that they must implement a workplace safety plan. Insurance companies and CompSource Oklahoma are required to report the names of high-hazard employers to the Oklahoma Department of Labor by July l " each year. This report is prepared based upon the information provided by insurance carriers. In accordance with the provisions of Title 36 O.S. § 6702, once an employer is reported, the employer is retained in the reported information until the employer's incidence rate and experience modifier (e-mod) fall below targeted levels for three (3) consecutive years. By tracking employers over time and making comparisons on employers' injury rates, conclusions may be drawn about the impact of safety programs as a factor in occupational injury and illness reductions. -1- ---------" Worker Safety Policy Council 2003 Members BRENDA RENEAU WYNN, Chairperson Commissioner of Labor 4001 North Lincoln Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73105-5212 405-528-1500, Ext. 200; Fax 405-528-5751 Commissioner of Labor SANDRA ARNOLD Representing Oklahoma Department of Commerce Department of Commerce PO Box 26980 Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0980 405-815-5172; Fax 405-815-5142 SCOTT BARGER Representing Public Employees Oklahoma Public Employees Association 13 NE 28th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-524-6764; Fax 405-524-4671 STEPHEN A. BOONE III Representing American Society of Safety Engineers The Boeing Company P. O. Box 582808 MC D923-B123 Tulsa, OK 74158-2808 918-832-3487; Fax 918-832-3625 DON ELLIOTT Representing CompSource Oklahoma CompSource Oklahoma 410 North Walnut Oklahoma City, OK 73104 405-552-5407; Fax 405-552-5873 DANNY GEORGE Representing Oklahoma Municipal League Oklahoma Municipal League 201 NE 23rd Street Oklahoma CitY,OK 73105 405-528-7515 ; Fax 405-528-7560 JOHN E. STEVENS, JR., PHD, CIH Representing American Industrial Hygiene Association Oklahoma State University 2002 South Iba Drive Stillwater, OK 74074 405-744-5721; Fax 405-744-6758 -2- DEBBI HART-BERTONE Representing Insurance Commissioner State Board of Property & Casualty 2401 NW 23rd Street, Suite 28 Oklahoma City, OK 73152-3408 405-522-4602; Fax 405-522-3761 GERRI MOONEY Representing Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Court 1915 North Stiles Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-522-8600; Fax 405-522-8683 DON POWERS Director Quality Assurance / Safety, Health & Environment University of Central Oklahoma Campus Box 110, 100 North University Drive Edmond, OK 73034 405-974-2216; Fax 405-974-3813 Representing Public Schools DAVE SCHMIDT Oklahoma Safety Council 4323 N.W. 63rd St., Ste. 140 Oklahoma City, OK 73116 405-848-8626; Fax 405-843-8201 Representing Oklahoma Safety Council MIKE SENEY Representing Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce & Industry Manufacturers' Department State Chamber of Commerce 330 NE lOth Street Oklahoma City, OK 73104-3220 405-235-3669; Fax 405-235-3670 JIM BOWlEN UAW-GM 2420 Leanway Dr. Oklahoma City, OK 73159 405-733-6838 Representing Oklahoma Labor Unions CHUCK MILLS Mills Machine Company P.O. Box 1514 Shawnee, OK 74802 405-273-4900 Representing Private Sector Employers -3- Legislative Members SENATOR MAXINE HORNER State Senate State Capitol Building, Room 428-B Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-521-5598; Fax 405-521-5507 SENATOR HARRY COATES State Senate State Capitol Building, Room 514-A Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-557-5547; Fax 405-530-2326 REPRESENTATIVE REBECCA HAMILTON House of Representatives State Capitol Building, Room 301 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-557-7397; Fax 405-962-7672 REPRESENTATIVE JERRY ELLIS House of Representatives State Capitol Building, Room 300 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-557-7363; Fax 405-557-7351 -4- 1996 High-Hazard Industries m. 1996 REPORT This section will show how the high-hazard industries of 1996 performed in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 2001 and 2002. This report will show a seven-year comparison of the original companies first reported in 1996. The following are results of the comparison and an indication of how safety programs are doing in the state of Oklahoma. High-hazard industries reported in 1996 were removed from the list in 2000 if the e-mod remained below 1.25 for all three years following the initial reporting. • Eighty-nine (89) companies were reported for 1996 by workers' compensation insurance carriers under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702 as being high-hazard employers requiring the development of a workplace safety program. • In 1997, 77 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 17 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating, 53 decreased their annual e-mod rating and seven remained the same. • In 1998, 62 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, 15 companies had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 47 decreased. • In 1999, 63 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, 10 companies had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 53 decreased. • In 2000, 45 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, six (6) had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 39 decreased. • In 2001, 36 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, five (5) had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 31 decreased. • In 2002, 23 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, four (4) had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 19 decreased. The clear indications, based upon this seven-year comparison, confirms the success of workplace safety programs. Additional information provides graphic representation of each major industry's percent of the high-hazard report and how the incidence rates ofthese major industries changed from 1996 to 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 and 2002. -6- Chart 1: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 48.3% Agriculture Services Retail Trade Chart 2: 1997 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction Agriculture 2.6% Retail Trade Chart 3: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 53.2% Agriculture 1.6% Services Retail Trade -7- Chart 4: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 49.2% Agriculture Services Retail Trade Chart 5: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Construction Manufacturing 22.2% 42.2% Agriculture Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 2.2% -8- Chart 6: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 38.9% Agriculture Services Wholesale Trade 2.8% Chart 7: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Retail Trade 34.8% Construction Agriculture Services -9- Chart 8: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 3.3% Manufacturing Construction Agriculture 2.2% Services Chart 9: 1997 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing 20.1% Agriculture 0.5% Services *Chart 10: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Construction Manufacturing 'The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997, the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that company's closure. Agricultural, forestry and fishing represented less than 0.1% of 1998 high-hazard employees. -10- *Chart 11: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 2.7% Manufacturing 19.6% Construction Agriculture Services Chart 12: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.3% Retail Trade 3.3% Manufacturing 14.2% Construction Agriculture Services 'The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997, the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that company's closure. Agricultural, forestry and fishing represented less than 0.1% of 1998 high-hazard employees. -11- Chart 13: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.7% Retail Trade Manufacturing Services Construction Agriculture Chart 14: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Services -12- Manufacturing Construction 0.6% Agriculture 1.4% Chart 15: Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 2.6% Manufacturing 21.1% Construction Agriculture 0.6% Services Chart J 6: 1997 Percent ofTnjuries by High Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 2.8% Manufacturing Construction Agriculture 0.5% Chart J 7: J 998 Percent ofTnjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Retail Trade 3.4% 24.3% Construction Agriculture 0.1% Services -13- Chart 18: 1999 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade Manufacturing 26.7% Construction Agriculture 1.6% Services Chart 19: 2000 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade Manufacturing 20.0% Construction Agriculture 0.2% -14- Chart 20: 2001 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Services Wholesale Trade 0.4% Manufacturing Construction 1.3% Agriculture 1.1% Chart 21: 2002 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Services Retail Trade 1.3% Manufacturing Construction 1.0% Agriculture 1.4% -15- Chart 22: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1996 High-Hazard SIC's 50 50~------------------------------------------------------------~ ~----- 10 404---------------------------------------------==~---------- 304---------------------------------~ 20 22.2 f-L--------------II18.2 10.3 o o Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Construction Agriculture • 1996 D 1997 • 1998 D 1999 0 2000 D 2001 D 2002 -16- 1997 High-Hazard Industries IV. 1997 REPORT This section of the report represents how the high-hazard industries of 1997 performed in 1998, 1999,2000,2001 and 2002. It shows a six-year comparison of the original companies reported in 1997. The following are results of the comparison and an indication of how safety programs are doing in the state of Oklahoma. High-hazard industries reported in 1997 were removed from the list in 2001 if the e-mod remained below 1.25 for all three years following the initial reporting. • Eighty-five (85) companies were reported for 1997 by workers' compensation insurance carriers under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702 as being high-hazard employers requiring the development of a workplace safety program. • In 1998, 67 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 15 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating, 38 decreased their annual e-mod rating and 14 remained the same. • In 1999,67 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 15 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 52 decreased. • In 2000,63 of the 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 51 decreased. • In2001, 44 of the 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 32 decreased. • In 2002,32 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 20 decreased. Based upon this six-year comparison the data again confirms the success of workplace safety programs. Additional information provides graphic representation of each major industry's percent of the high-hazard report and how the incidence rates of these major industries changed from 1997 to 1998, 1999 2000, 2001 and 2002. -18- Manufacturing Chart 23: Percent ofCornpanies by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 38.8% Wholesale Trade Construction Chart 24: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing Wholesale Trade 40.3% Retail Trade Construction Chart 25: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing 37.3% Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Services -19- Construction Chart 26: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing 42.9% Wholesale Trade Construction Chart 27: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing 34.1% Wholesale Trade Construction Retail Trade Chart 28: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing Wholesale Trade 28.1% Retail Trade Construction Services -20- Chart 29: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 2.1% Manufacturing Construction *Chart 30: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Construction Wholesale Trade 1.0% Retail Trade 4.0% Manufacturing Services Chart 31: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Tndustry Using 1997 STC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 1.6% Construction *The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997, the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that company's closure. -21- Chart 32: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 1.8% Construction Services Chart 33: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's Retail3.T4r%:ade Wholesale Trade Construction Services Chart 34: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's Services Wholesale Trade 0.9% Manufacturing Construction -22- Chart 35: Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 1.6% Manufacturing Construction Chart 36: 1998 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.6% Retail Trade Manufacturing Construction Services Chart 37: 1999 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 0.8% Manufacturing Construction 2.2% Services -23- Chart 38: 2000 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.6% Retail Trade Manufacturing 24.7% Construction Services Chart 39: 2001 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Services Retail Trade 0.8% Wholesale Trade 2.5% Construction 2.2% Chart 40: 2002 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Services Retail Trade 2.0% Wholesale Trade 0.8% Manufacturing Construction 0.6% -24- Chart 41: 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1997 High-Hazard SIC's 25 5 §2J 20.9 -~ 19~1~6.9 - 15.9 14.6 14.~ r= -I---- I--- ~~ - ~ 11.7 10.8 ~ ~0.8}!~ 10 ~ ~ ,.-- 9.6 [iE -f--- '8-.8 8~.E - ~ (~ 8.7r- 7.4 r-- r-t- - -I---- 4. '4[1A) f-- r- :..... .....~ 3.6 lr-- 2 ~( r::= k -'---- - - L- 20 15 10 o Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Construction ( • 1997 o 1998 • 1999 o 2000 2001 o 2002 ) -25-
Object Description
Description
Title | Workplace Safety 2003 pt1 |
Contents | 2003 issues contains reports for 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 |
OkDocs Class# | L400.3 W926s/h 2003 |
Digital Format | PDF, Adobe Reader required |
ODL electronic copy | Deposited by agency in print; scanned by Oklahoma Department of Libraries 7/2011 |
Rights and Permissions | This Oklahoma state government publication is provided for educational purposes under U.S. copyright law. Other usage requires permission of copyright holders. |
Language | English |
Full text | L 400.3 W926s/h 2003 c.l Worker Safety Policy Council Workplace Safety Program For High-Hazard Employers Annual Report December 2003 Submitted pursuant to Title 36 O.S. § 6702 Brenda Reneau Wynn Commissioner of Labor TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Authority and Procedure 1 ll. Worker Safety Policy Council 2003 Members 2 ill. 1996 Report 6 Chart 1: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 7 Chart 2: 1997 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 7 Chart 3: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 7 Chart 4: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 8 Chart 5: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 8 Chart 6: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 9 Chart 7: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 9 Chart 8: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 10 Chart 9: 1997 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 10 Chart 10: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 10 Chart 11: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 11 Chart 12: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 11 Chart 13: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 12 Chart 14: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 12 Chart 15: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 13 Chart 16: 1997 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 13 Chart 17: 1998 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 13 Chart 18: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 14 -1- Chart 19: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 14 Chart 20: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 15 Chart 21: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 15 Chart 22: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1996 High-Hazard SIC's 16 IV. 1997 Report 18 Chart 23: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 19 Chart 24: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 19 Chart 25: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 19 Chart 26: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20 Chart 27: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20 Chart 28: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20 Chart 29: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 21 Chart 30: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 21 Chart 31: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 21 Chart 32: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22 Chart 33: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22 Chart 34: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22 Chart 35: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 23 Chart 36: 1998 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 23 Chart 37: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 23 Chart 38: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24 Chart 39: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24 Chart 40: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24 -11- Chart 41: 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1997 High-Hazard SIC's 25 V. 1998 Report 27 Chart 42: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 28 Chart 43: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 28 Chart 44: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 28 Chart 45: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 29 Chart 46: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 29 Chart 47: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 30 Chart 48: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 30 Chart 49: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 30 Chart 50: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 31 Chart 51: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 31 Chart 52: Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 32 Chart 53: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 32 Chart 54: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 32 Chart 55: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 33 Chart 56: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 33 Chart 57: 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1998 High-Hazard SIC's 34 VI. 1999 Report 36 Chart 58: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 37 Chart 59: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 37 Chart 60: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 38 -111- Chart 61: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 38 Chart 62: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 39 Chart 63: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 39 Chart 64: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 40 Chart 65: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 40 Chart 66: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 41 Chart 67: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 41 Chart 68: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 42 Chart 69: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 42 Chart 70: 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1999 High-Hazard SIC's 43 VII. 2000 Report 45 Chart 71: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 46 Chart 72: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 46 Chart 73: 2003 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 46 Chart 74: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 47 Chart 75: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 47 Chart 76: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 47 Chart 77: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 48 Chart 78: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 48 Chart 79: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 48 Chart 80: 2000, 2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 2000 High-Hazard SIC's 49 -IV- VB. 2001 Report 51 Chart 81: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 52 Chart 82: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 52 Chart 83: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 53 Chart 84: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 53 Chart 85: Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 54 Chart 86: 2002 Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 54 Chart 87: 2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 2001 High-Hazard SIC's 55 -v- I. AUTHORIlY & PROCEDURE Title 36 O.S. § 6702 establishes a reporting requirement which is subsequent to the List of Most Hazardous Industries reporting required by Title 40 O.S. § 425. The reporting process consists of the Oklahoma Department of Labor identifying hazardous industries with high incidence rates by Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC) and transmitting this list to the Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner within 45 days of publication of the annual Occupational Injury & lllness Report by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics which is based upon the data and information provided by the Oklahoma Department of Labor, Statistical Research & Analysis Unit. The Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner then distributes the list to all insurance companies who provide workers' compensation insurance in the state. Under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702, all insurance companies, including CompSource Oklahoma, must notify listed policyholders that they must implement a workplace safety plan. Insurance companies and CompSource Oklahoma are required to report the names of high-hazard employers to the Oklahoma Department of Labor by July l " each year. This report is prepared based upon the information provided by insurance carriers. In accordance with the provisions of Title 36 O.S. § 6702, once an employer is reported, the employer is retained in the reported information until the employer's incidence rate and experience modifier (e-mod) fall below targeted levels for three (3) consecutive years. By tracking employers over time and making comparisons on employers' injury rates, conclusions may be drawn about the impact of safety programs as a factor in occupational injury and illness reductions. -1- ---------" Worker Safety Policy Council 2003 Members BRENDA RENEAU WYNN, Chairperson Commissioner of Labor 4001 North Lincoln Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73105-5212 405-528-1500, Ext. 200; Fax 405-528-5751 Commissioner of Labor SANDRA ARNOLD Representing Oklahoma Department of Commerce Department of Commerce PO Box 26980 Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0980 405-815-5172; Fax 405-815-5142 SCOTT BARGER Representing Public Employees Oklahoma Public Employees Association 13 NE 28th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-524-6764; Fax 405-524-4671 STEPHEN A. BOONE III Representing American Society of Safety Engineers The Boeing Company P. O. Box 582808 MC D923-B123 Tulsa, OK 74158-2808 918-832-3487; Fax 918-832-3625 DON ELLIOTT Representing CompSource Oklahoma CompSource Oklahoma 410 North Walnut Oklahoma City, OK 73104 405-552-5407; Fax 405-552-5873 DANNY GEORGE Representing Oklahoma Municipal League Oklahoma Municipal League 201 NE 23rd Street Oklahoma CitY,OK 73105 405-528-7515 ; Fax 405-528-7560 JOHN E. STEVENS, JR., PHD, CIH Representing American Industrial Hygiene Association Oklahoma State University 2002 South Iba Drive Stillwater, OK 74074 405-744-5721; Fax 405-744-6758 -2- DEBBI HART-BERTONE Representing Insurance Commissioner State Board of Property & Casualty 2401 NW 23rd Street, Suite 28 Oklahoma City, OK 73152-3408 405-522-4602; Fax 405-522-3761 GERRI MOONEY Representing Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Court 1915 North Stiles Avenue Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-522-8600; Fax 405-522-8683 DON POWERS Director Quality Assurance / Safety, Health & Environment University of Central Oklahoma Campus Box 110, 100 North University Drive Edmond, OK 73034 405-974-2216; Fax 405-974-3813 Representing Public Schools DAVE SCHMIDT Oklahoma Safety Council 4323 N.W. 63rd St., Ste. 140 Oklahoma City, OK 73116 405-848-8626; Fax 405-843-8201 Representing Oklahoma Safety Council MIKE SENEY Representing Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce & Industry Manufacturers' Department State Chamber of Commerce 330 NE lOth Street Oklahoma City, OK 73104-3220 405-235-3669; Fax 405-235-3670 JIM BOWlEN UAW-GM 2420 Leanway Dr. Oklahoma City, OK 73159 405-733-6838 Representing Oklahoma Labor Unions CHUCK MILLS Mills Machine Company P.O. Box 1514 Shawnee, OK 74802 405-273-4900 Representing Private Sector Employers -3- Legislative Members SENATOR MAXINE HORNER State Senate State Capitol Building, Room 428-B Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-521-5598; Fax 405-521-5507 SENATOR HARRY COATES State Senate State Capitol Building, Room 514-A Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-557-5547; Fax 405-530-2326 REPRESENTATIVE REBECCA HAMILTON House of Representatives State Capitol Building, Room 301 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-557-7397; Fax 405-962-7672 REPRESENTATIVE JERRY ELLIS House of Representatives State Capitol Building, Room 300 Oklahoma City, OK 73105 405-557-7363; Fax 405-557-7351 -4- 1996 High-Hazard Industries m. 1996 REPORT This section will show how the high-hazard industries of 1996 performed in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 2001 and 2002. This report will show a seven-year comparison of the original companies first reported in 1996. The following are results of the comparison and an indication of how safety programs are doing in the state of Oklahoma. High-hazard industries reported in 1996 were removed from the list in 2000 if the e-mod remained below 1.25 for all three years following the initial reporting. • Eighty-nine (89) companies were reported for 1996 by workers' compensation insurance carriers under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702 as being high-hazard employers requiring the development of a workplace safety program. • In 1997, 77 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 17 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating, 53 decreased their annual e-mod rating and seven remained the same. • In 1998, 62 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, 15 companies had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 47 decreased. • In 1999, 63 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, 10 companies had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 53 decreased. • In 2000, 45 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, six (6) had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 39 decreased. • In 2001, 36 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, five (5) had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 31 decreased. • In 2002, 23 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, four (4) had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 19 decreased. The clear indications, based upon this seven-year comparison, confirms the success of workplace safety programs. Additional information provides graphic representation of each major industry's percent of the high-hazard report and how the incidence rates ofthese major industries changed from 1996 to 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 and 2002. -6- Chart 1: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 48.3% Agriculture Services Retail Trade Chart 2: 1997 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction Agriculture 2.6% Retail Trade Chart 3: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 53.2% Agriculture 1.6% Services Retail Trade -7- Chart 4: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 49.2% Agriculture Services Retail Trade Chart 5: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Construction Manufacturing 22.2% 42.2% Agriculture Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 2.2% -8- Chart 6: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Construction 38.9% Agriculture Services Wholesale Trade 2.8% Chart 7: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Retail Trade 34.8% Construction Agriculture Services -9- Chart 8: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 3.3% Manufacturing Construction Agriculture 2.2% Services Chart 9: 1997 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing 20.1% Agriculture 0.5% Services *Chart 10: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Construction Manufacturing 'The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997, the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that company's closure. Agricultural, forestry and fishing represented less than 0.1% of 1998 high-hazard employees. -10- *Chart 11: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 2.7% Manufacturing 19.6% Construction Agriculture Services Chart 12: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.3% Retail Trade 3.3% Manufacturing 14.2% Construction Agriculture Services 'The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997, the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that company's closure. Agricultural, forestry and fishing represented less than 0.1% of 1998 high-hazard employees. -11- Chart 13: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.7% Retail Trade Manufacturing Services Construction Agriculture Chart 14: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Services -12- Manufacturing Construction 0.6% Agriculture 1.4% Chart 15: Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 2.6% Manufacturing 21.1% Construction Agriculture 0.6% Services Chart J 6: 1997 Percent ofTnjuries by High Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade 2.8% Manufacturing Construction Agriculture 0.5% Chart J 7: J 998 Percent ofTnjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Manufacturing Retail Trade 3.4% 24.3% Construction Agriculture 0.1% Services -13- Chart 18: 1999 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade Manufacturing 26.7% Construction Agriculture 1.6% Services Chart 19: 2000 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Retail Trade Manufacturing 20.0% Construction Agriculture 0.2% -14- Chart 20: 2001 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Services Wholesale Trade 0.4% Manufacturing Construction 1.3% Agriculture 1.1% Chart 21: 2002 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's Services Retail Trade 1.3% Manufacturing Construction 1.0% Agriculture 1.4% -15- Chart 22: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1996 High-Hazard SIC's 50 50~------------------------------------------------------------~ ~----- 10 404---------------------------------------------==~---------- 304---------------------------------~ 20 22.2 f-L--------------II18.2 10.3 o o Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Construction Agriculture • 1996 D 1997 • 1998 D 1999 0 2000 D 2001 D 2002 -16- 1997 High-Hazard Industries IV. 1997 REPORT This section of the report represents how the high-hazard industries of 1997 performed in 1998, 1999,2000,2001 and 2002. It shows a six-year comparison of the original companies reported in 1997. The following are results of the comparison and an indication of how safety programs are doing in the state of Oklahoma. High-hazard industries reported in 1997 were removed from the list in 2001 if the e-mod remained below 1.25 for all three years following the initial reporting. • Eighty-five (85) companies were reported for 1997 by workers' compensation insurance carriers under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702 as being high-hazard employers requiring the development of a workplace safety program. • In 1998, 67 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 15 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating, 38 decreased their annual e-mod rating and 14 remained the same. • In 1999,67 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 15 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 52 decreased. • In 2000,63 of the 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 51 decreased. • In2001, 44 of the 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 32 decreased. • In 2002,32 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their annual e-mod rating and 20 decreased. Based upon this six-year comparison the data again confirms the success of workplace safety programs. Additional information provides graphic representation of each major industry's percent of the high-hazard report and how the incidence rates of these major industries changed from 1997 to 1998, 1999 2000, 2001 and 2002. -18- Manufacturing Chart 23: Percent ofCornpanies by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 38.8% Wholesale Trade Construction Chart 24: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing Wholesale Trade 40.3% Retail Trade Construction Chart 25: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing 37.3% Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Services -19- Construction Chart 26: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing 42.9% Wholesale Trade Construction Chart 27: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing 34.1% Wholesale Trade Construction Retail Trade Chart 28: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Manufacturing Wholesale Trade 28.1% Retail Trade Construction Services -20- Chart 29: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 2.1% Manufacturing Construction *Chart 30: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Construction Wholesale Trade 1.0% Retail Trade 4.0% Manufacturing Services Chart 31: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Tndustry Using 1997 STC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 1.6% Construction *The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997, the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that company's closure. -21- Chart 32: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 1.8% Construction Services Chart 33: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's Retail3.T4r%:ade Wholesale Trade Construction Services Chart 34: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's Services Wholesale Trade 0.9% Manufacturing Construction -22- Chart 35: Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 1.6% Manufacturing Construction Chart 36: 1998 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.6% Retail Trade Manufacturing Construction Services Chart 37: 1999 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Retail Trade Wholesale Trade 0.8% Manufacturing Construction 2.2% Services -23- Chart 38: 2000 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Wholesale Trade 0.6% Retail Trade Manufacturing 24.7% Construction Services Chart 39: 2001 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Services Retail Trade 0.8% Wholesale Trade 2.5% Construction 2.2% Chart 40: 2002 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's Services Retail Trade 2.0% Wholesale Trade 0.8% Manufacturing Construction 0.6% -24- Chart 41: 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates Per 100 Workers Using 1997 High-Hazard SIC's 25 5 §2J 20.9 -~ 19~1~6.9 - 15.9 14.6 14.~ r= -I---- I--- ~~ - ~ 11.7 10.8 ~ ~0.8}!~ 10 ~ ~ ,.-- 9.6 [iE -f--- '8-.8 8~.E - ~ (~ 8.7r- 7.4 r-- r-t- - -I---- 4. '4[1A) f-- r- :..... .....~ 3.6 lr-- 2 ~( r::= k -'---- - - L- 20 15 10 o Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Construction ( • 1997 o 1998 • 1999 o 2000 2001 o 2002 ) -25- |
Date created | 2011-07-25 |
Date modified | 2011-07-25 |