Workplace safety program for high-hazard employers annual report

              L 400.3 W926s/h 2003 c.l
Worker Safety Policy Council
Workplace Safety Program
For High-Hazard Employers
Annual Report
December 2003
Submitted pursuant to Title 36 O.S. § 6702
Brenda Reneau Wynn
Commissioner of Labor
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Authority and Procedure 1
ll. Worker Safety Policy Council 2003 Members 2
ill. 1996 Report 6
Chart 1: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 7
Chart 2: 1997 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 7
Chart 3: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 7
Chart 4: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 8
Chart 5: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 8
Chart 6: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 9
Chart 7: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 9
Chart 8: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 10
Chart 9: 1997 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 10
Chart 10: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 10
Chart 11: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 11
Chart 12: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 11
Chart 13: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 12
Chart 14: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 12
Chart 15: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's 13
Chart 16: 1997 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 13
Chart 17: 1998 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 13
Chart 18: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 14
-1-
Chart 19: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 14
Chart 20: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 15
Chart 21: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's 15
Chart 22: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 1996 High-Hazard SIC's 16
IV. 1997 Report 18
Chart 23: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 19
Chart 24: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 19
Chart 25: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 19
Chart 26: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20
Chart 27: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20
Chart 28: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 20
Chart 29: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 21
Chart 30: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 21
Chart 31: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 21
Chart 32: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22
Chart 33: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22
Chart 34: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 22
Chart 35: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's 23
Chart 36: 1998 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 23
Chart 37: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 23
Chart 38: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24
Chart 39: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24
Chart 40: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's 24
-11-
Chart 41: 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 1997 High-Hazard SIC's 25
V. 1998 Report 27
Chart 42: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 28
Chart 43: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 28
Chart 44: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 28
Chart 45: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 29
Chart 46: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 29
Chart 47: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 30
Chart 48: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 30
Chart 49: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 30
Chart 50: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 31
Chart 51: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 31
Chart 52: Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1998 SIC's 32
Chart 53: 1999 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 32
Chart 54: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 32
Chart 55: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 33
Chart 56: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1998 SIC's 33
Chart 57: 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 1998 High-Hazard SIC's 34
VI. 1999 Report 36
Chart 58: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 37
Chart 59: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 37
Chart 60: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 38
-111-
Chart 61: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 38
Chart 62: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 39
Chart 63: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 39
Chart 64: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 40
Chart 65: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 40
Chart 66: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1999 SIC's 41
Chart 67: 2000 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 41
Chart 68: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 42
Chart 69: 2002 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1999 SIC's 42
Chart 70: 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 1999 High-Hazard SIC's 43
VII. 2000 Report 45
Chart 71: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 46
Chart 72: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 46
Chart 73: 2003 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 46
Chart 74: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 47
Chart 75: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 47
Chart 76: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 47
Chart 77: Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 2000 SIC's 48
Chart 78: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 48
Chart 79: 2001 Percent ofInjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2000 SIC's 48
Chart 80: 2000, 2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 2000 High-Hazard SIC's 49
-IV-
VB. 2001 Report 51
Chart 81: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 52
Chart 82: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 52
Chart 83: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 53
Chart 84: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 53
Chart 85: Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 2001 SIC's 54
Chart 86: 2002 Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 2001 SIC's 54
Chart 87: 2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 2001 High-Hazard SIC's 55
-v-
I. AUTHORIlY & PROCEDURE
Title 36 O.S. § 6702 establishes a reporting requirement which is subsequent to the List of Most
Hazardous Industries reporting required by Title 40 O.S. § 425. The reporting process consists of
the Oklahoma Department of Labor identifying hazardous industries with high incidence rates by
Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC) and transmitting this list to the Oklahoma Insurance
Commissioner within 45 days of publication of the annual Occupational Injury & lllness Report by
the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics which is based upon the data and
information provided by the Oklahoma Department of Labor, Statistical Research & Analysis Unit.
The Oklahoma Insurance Commissioner then distributes the list to all insurance companies who
provide workers' compensation insurance in the state. Under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. §
6702, all insurance companies, including CompSource Oklahoma, must notify listed policyholders
that they must implement a workplace safety plan. Insurance companies and CompSource Oklahoma
are required to report the names of high-hazard employers to the Oklahoma Department of Labor by
July l " each year.
This report is prepared based upon the information provided by insurance carriers. In accordance
with the provisions of Title 36 O.S. § 6702, once an employer is reported, the employer is retained
in the reported information until the employer's incidence rate and experience modifier (e-mod) fall
below targeted levels for three (3) consecutive years. By tracking employers over time and making
comparisons on employers' injury rates, conclusions may be drawn about the impact of safety
programs as a factor in occupational injury and illness reductions.
-1-
---------"
Worker Safety Policy Council
2003 Members
BRENDA RENEAU WYNN, Chairperson
Commissioner of Labor
4001 North Lincoln Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK 73105-5212
405-528-1500, Ext. 200; Fax 405-528-5751
Commissioner of Labor
SANDRA ARNOLD Representing Oklahoma Department of Commerce
Department of Commerce
PO Box 26980
Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0980
405-815-5172; Fax 405-815-5142
SCOTT BARGER Representing Public Employees
Oklahoma Public Employees Association
13 NE 28th Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-524-6764; Fax 405-524-4671
STEPHEN A. BOONE III Representing American Society of Safety Engineers
The Boeing Company
P. O. Box 582808 MC D923-B123
Tulsa, OK 74158-2808
918-832-3487; Fax 918-832-3625
DON ELLIOTT Representing CompSource Oklahoma
CompSource Oklahoma
410 North Walnut
Oklahoma City, OK 73104
405-552-5407; Fax 405-552-5873
DANNY GEORGE Representing Oklahoma Municipal League
Oklahoma Municipal League
201 NE 23rd Street
Oklahoma CitY,OK 73105
405-528-7515 ; Fax 405-528-7560
JOHN E. STEVENS, JR., PHD, CIH Representing American Industrial Hygiene Association
Oklahoma State University
2002 South Iba Drive
Stillwater, OK 74074
405-744-5721; Fax 405-744-6758
-2-
DEBBI HART-BERTONE Representing Insurance Commissioner
State Board of Property & Casualty
2401 NW 23rd Street, Suite 28
Oklahoma City, OK 73152-3408
405-522-4602; Fax 405-522-3761
GERRI MOONEY Representing Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Court
1915 North Stiles Avenue
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-522-8600; Fax 405-522-8683
DON POWERS
Director Quality Assurance / Safety, Health & Environment
University of Central Oklahoma
Campus Box 110, 100 North University Drive
Edmond, OK 73034
405-974-2216; Fax 405-974-3813
Representing Public Schools
DAVE SCHMIDT
Oklahoma Safety Council
4323 N.W. 63rd St., Ste. 140
Oklahoma City, OK 73116
405-848-8626; Fax 405-843-8201
Representing Oklahoma Safety Council
MIKE SENEY Representing Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce & Industry
Manufacturers' Department
State Chamber of Commerce
330 NE lOth Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73104-3220
405-235-3669; Fax 405-235-3670
JIM BOWlEN
UAW-GM
2420 Leanway Dr.
Oklahoma City, OK 73159
405-733-6838
Representing Oklahoma Labor Unions
CHUCK MILLS
Mills Machine Company
P.O. Box 1514
Shawnee, OK 74802
405-273-4900
Representing Private Sector Employers
-3-
Legislative Members
SENATOR MAXINE HORNER
State Senate
State Capitol Building, Room 428-B
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-521-5598; Fax 405-521-5507
SENATOR HARRY COATES
State Senate
State Capitol Building, Room 514-A
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-557-5547; Fax 405-530-2326
REPRESENTATIVE REBECCA HAMILTON
House of Representatives
State Capitol Building, Room 301
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-557-7397; Fax 405-962-7672
REPRESENTATIVE JERRY ELLIS
House of Representatives
State Capitol Building, Room 300
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-557-7363; Fax 405-557-7351
-4-
1996
High-Hazard
Industries
m. 1996 REPORT
This section will show how the high-hazard industries of 1996 performed in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000
2001 and 2002. This report will show a seven-year comparison of the original companies first
reported in 1996. The following are results of the comparison and an indication of how safety
programs are doing in the state of Oklahoma. High-hazard industries reported in 1996 were removed
from the list in 2000 if the e-mod remained below 1.25 for all three years following the initial
reporting.
• Eighty-nine (89) companies were reported for 1996 by workers' compensation insurance
carriers under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702 as being high-hazard employers
requiring the development of a workplace safety program.
• In 1997, 77 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 17 had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating, 53 decreased their annual e-mod rating and seven remained the same.
• In 1998, 62 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, 15 companies had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating and 47 decreased.
• In 1999, 63 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, 10 companies had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating and 53 decreased.
• In 2000, 45 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, six (6) had an increase in their annual e-mod
rating and 39 decreased.
• In 2001, 36 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, five (5) had an increase in their annual
e-mod rating and 31 decreased.
• In 2002, 23 of the 89 companies had data reported by workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1996 high-hazard group. Of those, four (4) had an increase in their annual
e-mod rating and 19 decreased.
The clear indications, based upon this seven-year comparison, confirms the success of workplace
safety programs. Additional information provides graphic representation of each major industry's
percent of the high-hazard report and how the incidence rates ofthese major industries changed from
1996 to 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 and 2002.
-6-
Chart 1: Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing
Construction
48.3%
Agriculture
Services
Retail Trade
Chart 2: 1997 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing
Construction
Agriculture
2.6%
Retail Trade
Chart 3: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing Construction
53.2%
Agriculture
1.6%
Services
Retail Trade
-7-
Chart 4: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing
Construction
49.2%
Agriculture
Services
Retail Trade
Chart 5: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Construction
Manufacturing
22.2%
42.2%
Agriculture
Services
Retail Trade Wholesale Trade
2.2%
-8-
Chart 6: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing Construction
38.9%
Agriculture
Services
Wholesale Trade
2.8%
Chart 7: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing
Retail Trade
34.8%
Construction
Agriculture
Services
-9-
Chart 8: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's
Retail Trade
3.3% Manufacturing
Construction
Agriculture
2.2%
Services
Chart 9: 1997 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing
20.1%
Agriculture
0.5%
Services
*Chart 10: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Construction
Manufacturing
'The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997,
the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that
company's closure. Agricultural, forestry and fishing represented less than 0.1% of 1998 high-hazard employees.
-10-
*Chart 11: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Retail Trade
2.7%
Manufacturing
19.6%
Construction
Agriculture
Services
Chart 12: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Wholesale Trade
0.3%
Retail Trade
3.3%
Manufacturing
14.2%
Construction
Agriculture
Services
'The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997,
the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that
company's closure. Agricultural, forestry and fishing represented less than 0.1% of 1998 high-hazard employees.
-11-
Chart 13: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Wholesale Trade
0.7%
Retail Trade
Manufacturing
Services
Construction
Agriculture
Chart 14: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Services
-12-
Manufacturing
Construction
0.6%
Agriculture
1.4%
Chart 15: Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1996 SIC's
Retail Trade
2.6%
Manufacturing
21.1%
Construction
Agriculture
0.6%
Services
Chart J 6: 1997 Percent ofTnjuries by High Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Retail Trade
2.8% Manufacturing
Construction
Agriculture
0.5%
Chart J 7: J 998 Percent ofTnjuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Manufacturing
Retail Trade
3.4%
24.3%
Construction
Agriculture
0.1%
Services
-13-
Chart 18: 1999 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Retail Trade Manufacturing
26.7%
Construction
Agriculture
1.6%
Services
Chart 19: 2000 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Retail Trade
Manufacturing
20.0%
Construction
Agriculture
0.2%
-14-
Chart 20: 2001 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Services
Wholesale Trade
0.4%
Manufacturing
Construction
1.3%
Agriculture
1.1%
Chart 21: 2002 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1996 SIC's
Services
Retail Trade
1.3%
Manufacturing
Construction
1.0%
Agriculture
1.4%
-15-
Chart 22: 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 1996 High-Hazard SIC's 50 50~------------------------------------------------------------~ ~-----
10
404---------------------------------------------==~----------
304---------------------------------~
20
22.2
f-L--------------II18.2
10.3
o o
Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Construction Agriculture
• 1996 D 1997 • 1998 D 1999 0 2000 D 2001 D 2002
-16-
1997
High-Hazard
Industries
IV. 1997 REPORT
This section of the report represents how the high-hazard industries of 1997 performed in 1998,
1999,2000,2001 and 2002. It shows a six-year comparison of the original companies reported in
1997. The following are results of the comparison and an indication of how safety programs are
doing in the state of Oklahoma. High-hazard industries reported in 1997 were removed from the list
in 2001 if the e-mod remained below 1.25 for all three years following the initial reporting.
• Eighty-five (85) companies were reported for 1997 by workers' compensation insurance
carriers under the requirements of Title 36 O.S. § 6702 as being high-hazard employers
requiring the development of a workplace safety program.
• In 1998, 67 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 15 had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating, 38 decreased their annual e-mod rating and 14 remained the same.
• In 1999,67 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 15 had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating and 52 decreased.
• In 2000,63 of the 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating and 51 decreased.
• In2001, 44 of the 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating and 32 decreased.
• In 2002,32 ofthe 85 companies had data reported by the workers' compensation insurance
carriers on the 1997 high-hazard group. Of those companies, 12 had an increase in their
annual e-mod rating and 20 decreased.
Based upon this six-year comparison the data again confirms the success of workplace safety
programs.
Additional information provides graphic representation of each major industry's percent of the high-hazard
report and how the incidence rates of these major industries changed from 1997 to 1998, 1999
2000, 2001 and 2002.
-18-
Manufacturing
Chart 23: Percent ofCornpanies by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's
38.8%
Wholesale Trade
Construction
Chart 24: 1998 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade
40.3%
Retail Trade
Construction
Chart 25: 1999 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Manufacturing
37.3%
Wholesale Trade
Retail Trade
Services
-19-
Construction
Chart 26: 2000 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Manufacturing
42.9%
Wholesale Trade
Construction
Chart 27: 2001 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Manufacturing
34.1%
Wholesale Trade
Construction
Retail Trade
Chart 28: 2002 Percent of Companies by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Manufacturing
Wholesale Trade 28.1%
Retail Trade
Construction
Services
-20-
Chart 29: Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's
Retail Trade
Wholesale Trade
2.1%
Manufacturing
Construction
*Chart 30: 1998 Percent of Employees by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Construction
Wholesale Trade
1.0%
Retail Trade
4.0%
Manufacturing
Services
Chart 31: 1999 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Tndustry Using 1997 STC's
Retail Trade
Wholesale Trade
1.6%
Construction
*The increase in construction in 1998 is due to a temporary employment agency which covers their employees workers' compensation. In 1996 and 1997,
the previous carrier did not report on the temporary employees but only on the office personnel. In 1999, construction decreased in employment due to that
company's closure.
-21-
Chart 32: 2000 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Retail Trade
Wholesale Trade
1.8%
Construction
Services
Chart 33: 2001 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Retail3.T4r%:ade
Wholesale Trade
Construction
Services
Chart 34: 2002 Percent of Employees by High-Hazardous Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Services
Wholesale Trade
0.9%
Manufacturing
Construction
-22-
Chart 35: Percent oflnjuries by High-Hazard Industry, 1997 SIC's
Retail Trade Wholesale Trade
1.6%
Manufacturing
Construction
Chart 36: 1998 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Wholesale Trade
0.6%
Retail Trade
Manufacturing
Construction
Services
Chart 37: 1999 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Retail Trade
Wholesale Trade
0.8%
Manufacturing
Construction
2.2%
Services
-23-
Chart 38: 2000 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Wholesale Trade
0.6%
Retail Trade
Manufacturing
24.7%
Construction
Services
Chart 39: 2001 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Services
Retail Trade
0.8%
Wholesale Trade
2.5%
Construction
2.2%
Chart 40: 2002 Percent of Injuries by High-Hazard Industry Using 1997 SIC's
Services
Retail Trade
2.0%
Wholesale Trade
0.8%
Manufacturing
Construction
0.6%
-24-
Chart 41: 1997, 1998, 1999,2000,2001 & 2002 Incidence Rates
Per 100 Workers Using 1997 High-Hazard SIC's
25
5
§2J 20.9
-~
19~1~6.9
- 15.9
14.6 14.~
r=
-I---- I---
~~
-
~ 11.7
10.8 ~ ~0.8}!~ 10
~
~ ,.-- 9.6 [iE -f--- '8-.8 8~.E - ~ (~ 8.7r-
7.4 r-- r-t-
- -I---- 4. '4[1A) f--
r- :..... .....~
3.6
lr--
2 ~( r::=
k
-'---- - - L-
20
15
10
o
Services Retail Trade Wholesale Trade Manufacturing Construction
( • 1997 o 1998 • 1999 o 2000 2001 o 2002 )
-25-